Health Plans that Fail ACA Minimum Value Test To Get One-Year Pass: IRS
By: Jerry Geisel (Business Insurance) November 2014
Group health care plans that do not provide coverage for hospital care will not pass the health care reform law’s “minimum value” test, but the Internal Revenue Service is giving a one-year pass to existing or soon to be implemented plans excluding the coverage.
Ending months of uncertainty on the issue, the IRS on Tuesday said such plans do not provide the minimum value requirement and that regulators will shortly propose regulations to this effect.
The IRS announcement involves a section of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that imposes, starting in 2015, stiff penalties on employers offering plans that do not pass an ACA minimum value test.
To pass that test, plans must pay for 60% of covered services. If a plan does not pass the minimum value test, lower-income employees — those earning up to 400% of the federal poverty level — can go to public insurance exchanges to obtain coverage, with the federal government subsidizing their premiums.
In that situation, employers are liable for a $3,000 penalty for each employee who obtains the subsidized coverage.
Likely due to a flaw in a government online calculator, low-cost plans that excluded coverage for hospital services were able to pass the minimum test, benefit experts said.
That, in turn, fueled interest in the plans, which cost about half the price of more traditional plans, especially from employers who have not offered coverage and starting in 2015, faced an ACA mandate to offer coverage or be hit with a stiff financial penalty.
But in its Tuesday announcement, the IRS said plans excluding hospital coverage fail the minimum value requirement.
The IRS, in its notice, suggested that its calculator gave faulty results. The IRS, Treasury and the Department of Health and Human Services are considering whether the calculator produced “valid actuarial results.”
Still, perhaps because its own software was to blame, the IRS said employers that — prior to Nov. 4 — entered into a “nonbinding agreement commitment” to offer plans excluding hospital coverage or began to enroll employees in the plans could offer the plans through the end of the next plan year.
In that situation, the employer would not incur a penalty, even if eligible employees opted for subsidized coverage through the public exchanges.
“That is appropriate relief,” given that employers relied on a government calculator in determining if the plans offers minimum value, said Rich Stover, a principal at Buck Consultants at Xerox in Secaucus, New Jersey.
“It is a win-win. Employers can still offer the plans for a year, and their employees can get robust coverage in exchanges without” the employers being penalized, said Ed Fensholt, senior vice president and director of compliance services at Lockton Cos. L.L.C.’s benefit group in Kansas City, Missouri.
Categories
- Benefits Resources
- Bonding
- BOP
- Business Insurance
- Commercial Auto
- Commercial Property
- Company News
- Construction
- Crime Insurance
- Cyber Insurance
- Directors & Officers
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Practice Liability Insurance
- Entertainment
- General Liability
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare
- Healthcare Reform
- Homeowners Insurance
- Hospitality
- Manufacturing
- Medical Malpractice
- Mining & Energy
- Nightclubs
- Personal Auto
- Personal Insurance
- Professional
- Restaurants
- Retail & Wholesale
- Risk Management Resources
- Safety Topics
- SBA Bonds
- Security
- Seminars
- Technology
- Tourism
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- Workers Compensation
Archives
- May 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- February 2013
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- November 2008
- August 2008