COVID-19: When Employees Refuse to Return to Work
Coming back to work after an extended period of time can be difficult for anyone. And still being in the midst of a pandemic does not make the return to work any easier for those who have been called up from telework or unemployment. However, what are employer options when employees refuse to come back or want to keep receiving their unemployment benefits? New federal and state employment laws regarding allowances for those impacted by the coronavirus make this a tricky obstacle to overcome on the path of getting back to business as usual.
Unemployment vs. Return to Work
For those that experienced unemployment due to their place of work being shut down over coronavirus concerns and government closures, unemployment is turning out to be kind of a good deal. In many cases, former employees, especially those in retail or restaurant landscapes, are making more money via unemployment benefits than they were making as full-time employees and aren’t especially looking to go back to work. While getting paid to stay home seems like the idea to stick with, there is potential to lose those benefits if you are offered employment again. This means additional federal benefits such as Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) that have become available through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act as well as state unemployment benefits.
Legitimate Reasoning
While some employees may refuse to come back to work on the grounds that they simply do not want to or are afraid of contracting coronavirus if they return to work (neither of which constitute a qualifying reason not to return to work if offered) there are specific cases in which they can refuse employment and continue with unemployment benefits under the CARES Act. An individual must prove that they are unemployed, partially unemployed, or unable to work for one of the following reasons:
- The individual has coronavirus or has exhibited symptoms and is awaiting a diagnosis from a medical professional
- A member of the individual’s household has been diagnosed or is awaiting a coronavirus diagnosis
- The individual is providing care to someone in their household with coronavirus
- A child or other person in the household for which the individual is the primary guardian is unable to attend school or another caregiving facility as a direct result of the coronavirus public health emergency and the type of care not currently available is required for the individual to work
- The individual is unable to reach the location of work as a direct result of the coronavirus public health emergency
- The individual has become the sole economic resource for the household because the previous support has died as a direct result of coronavirus
- The individual has to quit their job as a direct result of coronavirus
- The individual’s place of employment has closed as a direct result of coronavirus
- The individual meets any additional criteria under the law
Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loan Forgiveness
When it comes to the PPP loan and getting the full amount forgiven for the employees that were on payroll before coronavirus shutdowns, more is more. If an employer took out a certain loan amount and can’t show the need for it (i.e. employees being offered positions to come back to work and not taking them), there are options. Employers need to take the proper steps and be able to show that an offer was given, an offer was refused, and the reason for a refusal. If the refusal is a result of something other than the previously listed legitimate reasons, an employer can report it to the corresponding state agency for unemployment. As long as a written offer of employment with the same wage and hours the employee previously had was made in good faith, and the refusal was documented, employers will be able to keep their original loan forgiveness amount. Additionally, employers have now been given until December 31, 2020 to rehire employees that were laid-off if they are still seeking loan forgiveness.
Addressing Concerns
While the fear of contracting coronavirus is not a legitimized reason not to come back to work if offered employment, it does not mean it’s not a fear that needs to be mitigated for many employees before they return. Open lines of communication are key to allowing employees to voice their concerns. Such concerns and fears should be met with empathy as well as processes and procedures put in place to protect the employees to the best of the employer’s ability. Additionally, employers should do their best to make accommodations where applicable if it does not cause undue hardship on the business. Allowing employees to understand that their fears are real and helping them understand they are protected will be the likely reason many who were hesitant, will feel comfortable to return to work.
For Employers in Nevada
If you are an employer in Nevada that has had employees refuse to return to work, work refusals can be submitted to the Nevada Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation at:
- jobbankmpkwy@detr.nv.gov
- Subject Line: Work Refusal
- Details: Employer information – Name of Business, Address, Phone Number, Name of Employer Representative, FEIN, Employee Name, Last 4 digits of their social security number, Date they were notified of return to work, and reason for refusal
Information for Nevada provided by the Nevada Association of Employers.
For more information:
Categories
- Benefits Resources
- Bonding
- BOP
- Business Insurance
- Commercial Auto
- Commercial Property
- Company News
- Construction
- Crime Insurance
- Cyber Insurance
- Directors & Officers
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Practice Liability Insurance
- Entertainment
- General Liability
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare
- Healthcare Reform
- Homeowners Insurance
- Hospitality
- Manufacturing
- Medical Malpractice
- Mining & Energy
- Nightclubs
- Personal Auto
- Personal Insurance
- Professional
- Restaurants
- Retail & Wholesale
- Risk Management Resources
- Safety Topics
- SBA Bonds
- Security
- Seminars
- Technology
- Tourism
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- Workers Compensation
Archives
- May 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- February 2013
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- November 2008
- August 2008