Can Employees Access a Health Reimbursement Plan and Federal Subsidies?
By: Jeffery Hansen (Zane Benefits) August 2015
Under the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”), health insurance tax subsidies are available to the majority of individuals and families who do not receive insurance through an employer. If an employer offers a minimum level of coverage, employees are disqualified from the subsidies.
So, what about employees who are offered a Section 105 Health Reimbursement Plan (HRP)? Are participants in an HRP also disqualified from the subsidies? This article provides an overview of how the federal health insurance subsidies work in tandem with an HRP.
How an Employer’s Health Plan Impacts Eligibility for Subsidies
If an employee has an offer of health coverage from an employer whose plan meets certain standards (i.e. it is an “eligible employer-sponsored plan”), the employee is not eligible to receive a federal subsidy – even if the employee does not enroll in coverage.
However, if the employer’s health plan offered does not meet these standards, the employee is not disqualified from accessing the subsidies.
Let’s examine this closer.
Internal Revenue Code § 36B provides that individuals are allowed access to the health insurance subsidies as long as they are not eligible for other minimum essential coverage. This includes coverage under an eligible employer-sponsored plan that is also affordable to the employee and provides minimum value.
Under these guidelines, an individual is not considered to be offered minimum essential coverage if any one of the following circumstances apply:
1. The employer-sponsored plan does not qualify as an “eligible employer-sponsored plan,” or
2. The coverage provided is not affordable, or
3. The coverage does not provide minimum value.
When discussing an HRP, individuals are allowed access to premium tax credits because an HRP is not an “eligible employer-sponsored plan.”
What is an Eligible Employer-Sponsored Plan?
An eligible employer-sponsored plan, as defined by IRC § 5000A, is a governmental plan, or any other plan or coverage offered in the small or large group market (“group health insurance”).
Eligible employer-sponsored plan
The term “eligible employer-sponsored plan” means, with respect to any employee, a group health plan or group health insurance coverage offered by an employer to the employee which is—
(A) a governmental plan (within the meaning of section 2791(d)(8) of the Public Health Service Act), or
(B) any other plan or coverage offered in the small or large group market within a State.
Such term shall include a grandfathered health plan described in paragraph (1)(D) offered in a group market.
Conclusion
A Section 105 Health Reimbursement Plan (HRP), such as ZaneHealth, is not a governmental plan and does not provide coverage offered in the small or large group market within a state. As a result, an HRP is not an eligible employer-sponsored plan and does not qualify as minimum essential coverage.
For this reason, HRP participants – if otherwise eligible – are allowed access to the federal health insurance subsidies.
Categories
- Benefits Resources
- Bonding
- BOP
- Business Insurance
- Commercial Auto
- Commercial Property
- Company News
- Construction
- Crime Insurance
- Cyber Insurance
- Directors & Officers
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Practice Liability Insurance
- Entertainment
- General Liability
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare
- Healthcare Reform
- Homeowners Insurance
- Hospitality
- Manufacturing
- Medical Malpractice
- Mining & Energy
- Nightclubs
- Personal Auto
- Personal Insurance
- Professional
- Restaurants
- Retail & Wholesale
- Risk Management Resources
- Safety Topics
- SBA Bonds
- Security
- Seminars
- Technology
- Tourism
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- Workers Compensation
Archives
- May 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- February 2013
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- November 2008
- August 2008