Changes to the Additional Insured endorsements and what it means.
By: Rocco Abate (Capstone Brokerage) November 2013
The Insurance Services Office announced early this year that major changes were going to begin when it comes to obtaining Additional Insured certificates for General Liability Coverage. The changes are as follows:
1. Insurance provided to an additional insured will only apply to the extent permitted by law.
2. If additional insured coverage is required in a contract of agreement (which is customary), the additional insured will not be provided coverage that is any broader then required in the contract or agreement in the named insured
3. The limits available to an additional insured will be the lesser of the limits required by contract or available under the policy
To help make this more understandable
“Insurance Provided to an additional insured will only apply to the extent permitted by law.” Prior to this change, in states where anti-indemnity laws apply to Additional Insured coverage, state-specific Additional Insured endorsements were needed; if the wrong form were to be used, the Additional Insured coverage could be lost. The 2013 amendment addresses this issue by obviating the need for such state-specific endorsements.
“If additional insured coverage is required in a contract of agreement (which is customary), the additional insured will not be provided coverage that is any broader then required in the contract or agreement in the named insured.” In the past additional insured provisions in construction contracts varied. Some required adding additional insured while others wanted detailed descriptions of the scope of additional insured coverage or reference to specific ISO additional insured endorsement forms. However under the new law, additional insured endorsements, owners and contractors will need to specifically identify the scope of additional insured coverage or risk having no coverage at all despite being named an additional insured.
Lastly, “the limits available to an additional insured will be the lesser of the limits required by contract or available under the policy”. Previously, an insurance carrier providing additional insured coverage of a $1 million policy limit might be obligated to extend its full limit to an additional insured even though the contract only required a $500,000 limit. However now under the new additional insured endorsements, owners and contractors must be specific and identify the limits of additional insured coverage. The changes will affect required wording in contracts, and will limit the coverage amounts to only those set forth in contract.
One more thing to keep in mind when you’re named as an additional insured, don’t just rely on the party naming you as an additional insured giving you a certificate of insurance. As mentioned in a previous blog, Certificates of Insurance “DO NOT” confer insurance coverage or insured state. Best course of action is to require an actual additional insured endorsement that names your company specifically as an additional insured.
Categories
- Benefits Resources
- Bonding
- BOP
- Business Insurance
- Commercial Auto
- Commercial Property
- Company News
- Construction
- Crime Insurance
- Cyber Insurance
- Directors & Officers
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Practice Liability Insurance
- Entertainment
- General Liability
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare
- Healthcare Reform
- Homeowners Insurance
- Hospitality
- Manufacturing
- Medical Malpractice
- Mining & Energy
- Nightclubs
- Personal Auto
- Personal Insurance
- Professional
- Restaurants
- Retail & Wholesale
- Risk Management Resources
- Safety Topics
- SBA Bonds
- Security
- Seminars
- Technology
- Tourism
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- Workers Compensation
Archives
- May 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- February 2013
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- November 2008
- August 2008