Employers Returning to Fast Track for Captive Benefits Funding Requests
By: Jerry Geisel (Business Insurance) February 2015
For the first time since 2012, employers are taking advantage of a fast-track procedure to gain U.S. Department of Labor approval of paying for employee benefits through their captive insurance companies.
Hormel Foods Corp. and Sealed Air Corp. last month submitted expedited captive benefits funding requests to the Labor Department, which handles these applications. Under this approach known as ExPro, regulatory review and final approval can be completed in less than three months.
Labor Department approval is required because captive benefits funding generally is considered a prohibited transaction under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Hormel wants to use its Vermont-based captive to fund life insurance and long-term disability coverage for its employees, while Sealed Air Life wants to use its captive, also licensed in Vermont, to fund life and accidental death and dismemberment benefits for its employees.
“On the risk side, we saw opportunities to diversify the captive’s risk portfolio and achieve favorable long-term financial results,” said Jeff Horner, Hormel’s Austin, Minnesota-based risk manager.
Howard Edelstein, Sealed Air’s Elmwood Park, New Jersey-based director of risk management, said: “Just as companies can successfully assume a certain level of property/casualty risks, they also can successfully assume a certain level of benefit risks.”
Under ExPro, the Labor Department must act within 45 days of a company request for an exemption of an arrangement that normally would be barred by ERISA. The entire process, including a comment period for plan participants, takes about 2½ months, less than half the time often needed for exemptions that do not qualify for the quick-approval process.
“It no longer is a slow boat to China. Employers know they have time certainty,” said George O’Donnell, technical director of global risk consulting at Aon Risk Solutions in Somerset, New Jersey, which filed Hormel’s application. “The availability of ExPro is a huge advantage in implementing these programs.”
Previously, the expedited process generally was available to captive benefits funding applicants that could cite two substantially similar exemptions approved in the past 10 years, or one similar exemption and one approved through ExPro within the past five years.
In 2012, though, the Labor Department suspended the expedited approval option for captive benefits funding arrangements while reviewing the criteria, and completed that in late 2013.
In the interim, two employers applied for individual exemptions from the Labor Department to fund employee benefits risks via their captives.
The Coca-Cola Co. got approval in March 2013 for an individual exemption to use its South Carolina captive to reinsure group term life insurance and accidental death and dismemberment coverage. Last year, Intel Corp. received approval to reinsure life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance through its Hawaii captive.
Nearly simultaneous with approval of Intel’s application, Labor Department officials signaled the return of ExPro and said employers should review Coca-Cola’s and Intel’s approach before filing their captive benefits funding applications. Hormel and Sealed Air cited the Coca-Cola and Intel strategy in their applications.
While the Labor Department did not add new criteria in restoring the fast-track review process, experts say it did require greater clarity and more detail explaining how participants’ benefits would be enhanced with a captive.
Prior to the regulatory review, “You knew you had to enhance participants’ benefits. Now you have to be more precise in disclosing the actual improvement,” said Terry Richardson, a principal at PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. in Dallas.
If Hormel’s and Sealed Air’s benefits captives applications are approved, more employers are certain to follow, experts say.
“There can be cost savings” by funding benefits through a captive, compared with insured overage in the commercial market, said Debbie Liebeskind, a senior actuarial consultant at Towers Watson & Co. in Parsippany, New Jersey.
In fact, a rule of thumb is that employers funding benefits risks through their captives can cut benefits costs by 5% to 15%.
“The savings are there,” said Karin Landry, a managing partner at Boston-based Spring Consulting Group L.L.C., which filed Sealed Air’s captive benefits funding application.
Another advantage to adding benefits to a captive’s book of business is that it diversifies risks, reducing a captive’s exposure to losses if its experience is bad in one line of coverage.
Also, by funding the benefits risks through the captive, the captive earns investment income on those premiums as opposed to “sending out those dollars” to commercial insurers, Mr. Richardson said.
Categories
- Benefits Resources
- Bonding
- BOP
- Business Insurance
- Commercial Auto
- Commercial Property
- Company News
- Construction
- Crime Insurance
- Cyber Insurance
- Directors & Officers
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Practice Liability Insurance
- Entertainment
- General Liability
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare
- Healthcare Reform
- Homeowners Insurance
- Hospitality
- Manufacturing
- Medical Malpractice
- Mining & Energy
- Nightclubs
- Personal Auto
- Personal Insurance
- Professional
- Restaurants
- Retail & Wholesale
- Risk Management Resources
- Safety Topics
- SBA Bonds
- Security
- Seminars
- Technology
- Tourism
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- Workers Compensation
Archives
- May 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- February 2013
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- November 2008
- August 2008