Nevada Supreme Court Rulings Favor HOAs
By: Eli Segall, Las Vegas Review Journal, July 2017
The state Supreme Court on Thursday issued two rulings bolstering homeowners associations’ ability to sell houses through foreclosure.
Nevada’s highest court unanimously ruled that a 2014 decision upholding HOAs’ ability to foreclose ahead of mortgage lenders can be retroactively applied to foreclosures that took place before that ruling.
Separately, the seven-member panel also unanimously reversed a Clark County District Court’s decision to dismiss a lawsuit by a homebuyer who acquired a property through an HOA foreclosure and sued to wipe out the prior owners’ and lender’s rights to the house.
Collectively, the decisions appear to only boost HOAs’ ability in Nevada to seize homes from owners who fell behind on their association dues and to auction off the properties, at times for a relative pittance.
The retroactive-ruling case centered on a two-story home on Glimmering Sun Avenue in the Mountain’s Edge community of Las Vegas.
The house sold for about $315,800 in 2007, and the Tuscalante Homeowners Association sold it at auction for $40,000 in 2013, property and court records show. A division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, a Delaware bank that held the mortgage, later sued the buyer in federal court.
The lender claimed the sale to K&P Homes occurred without the bank receiving notice and was “invalid” and “unlawful.” When the house was auctioned, more than $278,000 was still owed on the mortgage, the lawsuit alleged.
The Nevada Supreme Court addressed the question of whether the 2014 HOA ruling could be applied retroactively.
The ruling, which involved a home in Southern Highlands where the HOA foreclosed before the mortgage lender, did not create a new law or overrule existing precedent, but rather declared what a law “has required” since its inception, Justice Ron Parraguirre wrote.
The other case decided Thursday centered on a two-story house on Beach Falls Court in the northwest valley.
The house sold for $175,000 in 2008, with the buyers using a mortgage insured by the Federal Housing Administration, according to property and court records. In 2014, the Desert Creek Homeowners Association sold the house through foreclosure for $20,000.
A few weeks later, the buyer, Kenneth Renfroe, filed a lawsuit seeking a court order to declare him the rightful owner and to wipe out the prior owners’ and lender’s rights to the house.
The lawsuit was dismissed. Renfroe appealed, and the Supreme Court reversed the decision.
The primary issue was whether state law was pre-empted by federal law when a mortgage is FHA-insured. But the pre-emption doctrine “does not apply in these circumstances” because the FHA insurance program “specifically contemplates” that lenders may be subject to higher-priority liens, Justice Lidia Stiglich wrote.
Categories
- Benefits Resources
- Bonding
- BOP
- Business Insurance
- Commercial Auto
- Commercial Property
- Company News
- Construction
- Crime Insurance
- Cyber Insurance
- Directors & Officers
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Practice Liability Insurance
- Entertainment
- General Liability
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare
- Healthcare Reform
- Homeowners Insurance
- Hospitality
- Manufacturing
- Medical Malpractice
- Mining & Energy
- Nightclubs
- Personal Auto
- Personal Insurance
- Professional
- Restaurants
- Retail & Wholesale
- Risk Management Resources
- Safety Topics
- SBA Bonds
- Security
- Seminars
- Technology
- Tourism
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- Workers Compensation
Archives
- May 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- February 2013
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- November 2008
- August 2008