Out-of-network medical records OK as evidence in Calif. work comp cases
By:Sheena Harrison (Business Journal) November 2013
Medical reports from out-of-network doctors are admissible as evidence in California workers compensation cases, the California Supreme Court has ruled.
In Elayne Valdez v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board et al., Ms. Valdez was injured when she fell while working for Warehouse Demo Services Inc., court records show. She initially was treated by a doctor in her employer’s medical provider network but was unsatisfied with that provider’s care.
Ms. Valdez later was treated by another physician who was recommended by her attorney, but was not in her employer’s provider network, records show. Reports from the non-network doctor were used as evidence in Ms. Valdez’s application for temporary disability workers comp benefits.
Warehouse Demo Services, which was insured by Zurich North America, argued that reports from Ms. Valdez’s out-of-network doctor were inadmissible in workers comp hearings, records show. However, a California workers comp judge ruled that “records from treating doctors have always been admissible” and awarded benefits to Ms. Valdez.
An en banc panel of the California workers comp appeals board reversed the judge’s decision, saying that only reports from network providers can be admitted in workers comp cases, records show. That ruling was overturned by the California Court of Appeal, which found that barring reports from any “privately retained physicians would eviscerate employees’ right under (California law) to consult with any doctor at their own expense.”
No general exclusion on medical providers
In a unanimous decision Thursday, the California Supreme Court upheld the appellate court ruling. In its ruling, the court said California law states that “no party is prohibited from obtaining any medical evaluation or consultation at the party’s own expense,” and that all “comprehensive medical evaluations obtained by any party shall be admissible in any proceeding before the appeals board.”
“The employer’s attempts to transform (California comp law) into a general rule of exclusion rest largely on its insistence that (provider networks), when established, must be the exclusive source of diagnosis and treatment for injured employees,” the ruling reads. “The Legislature has imposed no such requirement.”
The case was remanded to the state workers comp appeals board for further proceedings.
Categories
- Benefits Resources
- Bonding
- BOP
- Business Insurance
- Commercial Auto
- Commercial Property
- Company News
- Construction
- Crime Insurance
- Cyber Insurance
- Directors & Officers
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Practice Liability Insurance
- Entertainment
- General Liability
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare
- Healthcare Reform
- Homeowners Insurance
- Hospitality
- Manufacturing
- Medical Malpractice
- Mining & Energy
- Nightclubs
- Personal Auto
- Personal Insurance
- Professional
- Restaurants
- Retail & Wholesale
- Risk Management Resources
- Safety Topics
- SBA Bonds
- Security
- Seminars
- Technology
- Tourism
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- Workers Compensation
Archives
- May 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- February 2013
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- November 2008
- August 2008