Surplus Lines Stable, but Near-Term Profits Expected to Remain Weak: Reports
By: Judy Greenwald (Business Insurance) September 2014
The surplus line industry is stable, but profit margins may shrink in the near term as average rate increases diminish on various lines of coverage, says A.M. Best Co. Inc. in a report.
In addition, a separate report issued by Chicago-based Fitch Ratings Inc. also predicts that the segment’s profitability is likely to weaken in 2015 as pricing pressure and diminishing favorable loss reserves reduce underwriting performance, and continued low asset yields adversely affect investment income.
Professional lines insurers’ balance sheets, which have “endured many challenges” in recent years, have maintained “considerable strength to support future operating plans,” says the report issued Monday by Oldwick, New Jersey-based A.M. Best.
It was produced with the support of the Kansas City, Missouri-based National Association of Professional Surplus Lines Offices Ltd.’s Derek Hughes/NAPSLO Educational Foundation. The report, which is dated Sept. 15, was distributed to NAPSLO members Monday with Best’s special permission.
According to the report, surplus lines insurers benefited in 2013 from a relatively benign catastrophe year, which was “welcome relief, given the devastating impact that Superstorm Sandy had on this segment and indeed the entire insurance industry just one year earlier.”
But the Best report says while surplus lines companies’ accident-year reserve development has been slightly more favorable than that of the overall property/casualty insurance industry, “the gap has been shrinking as the markets wrestle with excess capacity, low interest rates and capital outlays to enhance operational efficiencies. A.M. Best expects surplus lines insurers’ underwriting to remain disciplined,” says the report, however.
The report also says surplus lines insurers’ percentage of commercial lines direct premiums written has more than doubled to a 13.7% share in 2013, compared with a 6.1% share in 1993.
Fitch reports on E&S segment
The Fitch report states excess and surplus lines market direct written premiums increased 8%, to $28 billion in 2013 over the prior-year period.
“Higher E&S premiums were driven by rising rates in various lines, increased exposure due to a continued, albeit slow, economic recovery and a reduced appetite from standard carriers to write nonstandard risks,” says the Fitch report. “However, rate increases have slowed and turned negative in some segments, particularly commercial property.”
The Fitch report says ample market capacity “will promote persistent competition and restrict future price movement” in the segment. It says Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s effort to increase participation in the E&S market has added $3.2 billion in capacity “to an already competitive market,” although its premium growth “has been measured to date.”
The report also predicts further market consolidation in 2014-2015 “as scale operations become more essential to manage expenses in an increasingly underwriting-focused environment.”
Categories
- Benefits Resources
- Bonding
- BOP
- Business Insurance
- Commercial Auto
- Commercial Property
- Company News
- Construction
- Crime Insurance
- Cyber Insurance
- Directors & Officers
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Practice Liability Insurance
- Entertainment
- General Liability
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare
- Healthcare Reform
- Homeowners Insurance
- Hospitality
- Manufacturing
- Medical Malpractice
- Mining & Energy
- Nightclubs
- Personal Auto
- Personal Insurance
- Professional
- Restaurants
- Retail & Wholesale
- Risk Management Resources
- Safety Topics
- SBA Bonds
- Security
- Seminars
- Technology
- Tourism
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- Workers Compensation
Archives
- May 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- February 2013
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- November 2008
- August 2008