Understanding Contractors’ Errors & Omissions Coverage
By: Karen L. Sorrell, Property Casualty 360, November 2017
The insurance carriers that provide limited liability coverage for construction work typically target their marketing efforts to trade contractors such as electricians and plumbers.
With some limited exceptions, the Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy doesn’t cover a contractor’s business risks as damage to the named insured’s work, or products or to impaired property.
Some insurers do provide limited coverage to contractors for their liability having to do with damage to their work, to products they may install, or to impaired property. Because there is no shortage of claims dealing with liability emanating from construction work, the insurers willing to provide this limited coverage typically limit their target marketing to trade contractors — electricians, plumbers, and heating and air conditioning contractors — when the exposures are not catastrophic.
Contractors’ E&O coverage should not be confused with contractors’ professional liability insurance, which is intended for contractors involved in construction management and design-build work.
Characteristics of the CGL policy
The majority of discussions of the CGL policy deal primarily with the standard provisions of the Insurance Services Office (ISO) form. Keep in mind, however, that many insurers rely on their own independently filed policies that often contain some provisions identical to the ISO standard, but may also include other nonstandard forms. Those insurers within the excess and surplus lines markets likewise issue standard ISO forms but may also mix and match other forms. The CGL policy can be a standard or nonstandard form. Wherever reference is made to standard, it means the provisions of ISO.
The CGL policy is generally written on an occurrence basis, although a standard claims-made form has been available since 1986. Typically, the CGL policy consists of three primary coverages: (1) bodily injury and property damage, (2) personal and advertising injury, and (3) premises medical payments. The form doesn’t cover exposures relating to (1) risks insurable under other policies; (2) risks subject to CGL coverage by endorsement, usually for an additional charge; and (3) risks not otherwise insurable.
The CGL policy, both standard and nonstandard, typically excludes property damage to the named insured’s work, the insured’s product, and impaired property.
Characteristics of contractors’ E&O coverage
Based on the contractors’ E&O policies reviewed, all are nonstandard, meaning each insurer has its own format and provisions; and are written on a claims-made basis.
The contractors’ E&O policy is not meant to duplicate what the CGL policy covers; it specifically excludes liability for bodily injury, property damage, and personal and advertising injury. It also doesn’t cover any property damage liability not excluded by the CGL policy.
What is covered, depending on the in specific contractors’ E&O policy, is property damage to the named insured’s work, the insured’s product, and impaired property. This example was provided by an insurer offering this specialized coverage: A contractor completes a $35,000 electrical job. A few months after the building’s occupancy, the named insured’s product (a faulty junction box) causes a fire that extensively damages the building. The electrician’s CGL policy would cover damage to the building, but exclude the $35,000 electrical work. If the electrician had a contractors’ E&O policy, the remaining damages would have been covered, provided sufficient limits.
The insuring agreement
The insuring agreements of the contractors’ E&O policy are somewhat more limited. These policies may duplicate what the standard ISO policy says but refine the agreement more narrowly. For example, an insuring agreement may reference “legally obligated to pay damages” but go on to say that the damages must result from an insured’s negligent act, error, or omission. The contractors’ E&O policy, in other words, doesn’t cover liability for intentional acts or torts under contract.
The insuring agreements of these policies do appear to hinge coverage on errors, omissions, or negligent acts. Thus, if a contractor knowingly decides to cut a corner for purposes of cutting costs and a problem arises, the insurer could deny coverage because of the conscious, intentional act of making that decision, even though there was no expectation of a future problem.
The trigger of a standard CGL policy written on an occurrence basis is at the time of injury or damage, during the policy period. When the standard claims-made policy is issued, the trigger is when notice of the claim for damages because of bodily injury or property damage is received and recorded by the insured or insurer, whichever is first.
Nature of injury or damage covered
The standard CGL policy provides coverage for damages because of bodily injury, property damage, and personal and advertising injury. Property damage coverage consists of two parts: (1) physical injury to tangible property, including all resulting loss of use; or (2) loss of use of tangible property that is not physically injured. Also covered, to the extent no exclusion applies, is damage to tangible property, other than the named insured’s work, product, or impaired property. However, property damage does not include electronic data.
Not covered and the reason for contactors’ E&O coverage is damage to the named insured’s work, products or impaired property, with some exceptions.
The contractors’ E&O policy applies solely to property damage, usually defined to the same extent as the standard CGL policy. One contractors’ E&O policy covers damages because of claims for faulty workmanship, material, design, or products; or consequential loss resulting (1) from the insured’s actual or alleged error, omission, or negligent act; or (2) from a defect in material or in a product sold, either of which is installed by the insured. Another insurer covers damages while acting in the named insured’s capacity, as described in the declarations, or from a defect in material or a product sold or installed by the insured, while acting in this capacity.
These policies are nonstandard, so they must be viewed carefully to make sure they apply to the kind of exposure that confronts the contractor. If a contractor does electrical work, the insurer will likely want to limit its coverage to that specialty and not be surprised to learn that the contractor also does metal roofing or installation of fiber optics.
Unless a CGL policy is modified with CG 21 04, Exclusion — Products-Completed Operations Hazard, coverage applies for liability stemming from an occurrence while work is in progress, as well as after work is completed or a product has been relinquished.
Contractors’ E&O liability coverage, on the other hand, applies only after work has been completed or a product has been relinquished. No coverage applies while work is in progress.
Categories
- Benefits Resources
- Bonding
- BOP
- Business Insurance
- Commercial Auto
- Commercial Property
- Company News
- Construction
- Crime Insurance
- Cyber Insurance
- Directors & Officers
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Practice Liability Insurance
- Entertainment
- General Liability
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare
- Healthcare Reform
- Homeowners Insurance
- Hospitality
- Manufacturing
- Medical Malpractice
- Mining & Energy
- Nightclubs
- Personal Auto
- Personal Insurance
- Professional
- Restaurants
- Retail & Wholesale
- Risk Management Resources
- Safety Topics
- SBA Bonds
- Security
- Seminars
- Technology
- Tourism
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- Workers Compensation
Archives
- May 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- February 2013
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- November 2008
- August 2008