Will Public Health Insurance Exchange Enrollees’ Higher Costs Ease Over Time?
By: Shelby Livingston (Business Insurance) April 2016
The public health insurance exchange population likely will continue to be characterized by members who are sicker and costlier than people covered by group health plans, but sources say most health insurers are in it for the long haul.
A recent Blue Cross Blue Shield Association study billed as the first of its kind found that individuals who enrolled in BCBS plans in 2014 and 2015 had more illnesses, used significantly more medical services and cost more than those enrolled in BCBS plans before the public exchanges authorized under the Affordable Care Act began operating as well as those covered by employer-sponsored health plans.
For instance, people who got health insurance recently have higher rates of diabetes, depression and coronary artery disease than people who had individual health insurance prior to 2014 and group health plans. They also were admitted to the hospital more often and used outpatient services more frequently.
Medical costs for the newer public exchange enrollees were 18.7% higher than employer-based group plan members in 2014 and 22.3% higher in 2015, according to the Blues study, which did not answer the question of whether the high disease rates and costs will subside and alleviate concerns that some major health insurers may drop out of the exchange business.
“The question comes down to does this market ever stabilize in the long term to get to a point where it’s either similar to employer-based coverage or at least not dramatically higher than some of the costs that you see in traditional group-based coverage?” said Chris Sloan, Washington-based senior manager with consultant Avalere Health.
Pittsburgh-based Highmark Health, a Blues affiliate; UnitedHealth Group Inc.; Humana Inc. and Aetna Inc. all have reported losses related to their public exchange health insurance business.
Insurers Want Change
“The carriers have been very vocal about the changes they would like to see in this market to make it viable,” Mr. Sloan said. Health insurers want to change requirements for special enrollment periods, which they say are too relaxed and allow individuals to enroll in coverage when they need treatment, then drop it once they complete the treatment.
Insurers are also calling for greater compensation from the health reform law’s risk adjustment program, which transfers payments from plans with lower-risk enrollees to plans with higher-risk, more costly enrollees.
Insurers also are increasing deductibles, raising premiums and narrowing their networks to increase the exchange plans’ profitability, said Stephen Zaharuk, New York-based senior vice president at Moody’s Investors Services Inc.
Health insurers realize “that this is a long-term issue. It’s going to take much longer to stabilize than we thought,” he said. “The insurance companies would somehow like to attract (the healthier) population and I think that’s what has to happen.”
Still, sources said they doubt insurers will pull out of the exchange market altogether.
“Bottom line, the insurance companies want this to be successful,” Mr. Zaharuk said. The exchange business is “a good deal for the insurance companies. It just has to be fixed.”
“Carriers see some future growth in this segment and I don’t think they are eager to pull out,” said Katherine Hempstead, Princeton, New Jersey-based senior adviser to the vice president at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. “I think there are ways to improve the stability of the market, and I think that the private sector and the regulators need to work together to figure out what those strategies are.”
Categories
- Benefits Resources
- Bonding
- BOP
- Business Insurance
- Commercial Auto
- Commercial Property
- Company News
- Construction
- Crime Insurance
- Cyber Insurance
- Directors & Officers
- Employee Benefits
- Employment Practice Liability Insurance
- Entertainment
- General Liability
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare
- Healthcare Reform
- Homeowners Insurance
- Hospitality
- Manufacturing
- Medical Malpractice
- Mining & Energy
- Nightclubs
- Personal Auto
- Personal Insurance
- Professional
- Restaurants
- Retail & Wholesale
- Risk Management Resources
- Safety Topics
- SBA Bonds
- Security
- Seminars
- Technology
- Tourism
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- Workers Compensation
Archives
- May 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- February 2013
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- November 2008
- August 2008